The Tricky Spots

Making communities safer is hard. Reaching across an aisle, whatever aisle it is, is difficult. Coordination can be daunting, but it will be worth it. Here are some tips for avoiding tricky spots.

  • Timing for each plan’s development, updates, and approvals may differ significantly. Be aware of time frames so that funding and staff resources for one plan can assist elsewhere as needed.
  • Different levels of specificity are needed for various risk and vulnerability assessments. Determine which plan needs the most specificity, and develop an assessment at that level so all plans can benefit. If this isn’t feasible, design the assessment so other components can be added as needed or as funding becomes available.
  • Ensure that a strategy, policy, or action in one plan does not contradict another plan. Comparing plan goals at the outset will help identify potential conflicts.
  • Check with neighboring jurisdictions to see if policy implementation can be coordinated, and that inconsistency will not create issues between jurisdictional boundaries.
  • Plan components can inform other plans, but entire plans generally are not interchangeable. For example, while parts of a local hazard mitigation plan and a general plan’s safety element might overlap, the plans are not interchangeable because FEMA requirements differ from safety element requirements.
  • There is no perfect science. Develop an adaptive process that allows modification as science advances. New information or legislative amendments may also trigger planning updates.